Are locks stigmatized in the natural hair community? | Black Girl with Long Hair Black Girl with Long Hair | Natural Hair Styles and Natural Hair Care

03 December 2009 ~ 62 Comments

Are locks stigmatized in the natural hair community?

Question of the Day

BGLHer Nev, a Boston native and winner of the Now and Then November giveaway, is currently free-forming her locks.

Freeform 2.JPG

freeform 1.JPG

Check out what she had to say about her choice of style:

“As you may know, I am currently freeforming my locs, which to many, is not “mainstream friendly” as it is usually considered a “messy” or “dirty” style, even to those who claim to appreciate natural hair. However, I consider my hair to be just as beautiful as that of any other natural head, regardless of the direct and indirect negativity I receive pertaining to my choice. I want to point this out because I feel that hair complexes are indeed a problem for black women all over the world, as you have mentioned in many of your blogs, and it does not stop with the natural hair community.”

What are your thoughts? Do you think locks are stigmatized, even in the natural hair community? And if so, why?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


62 Responses to “Are locks stigmatized in the natural hair community?”

  1. A 3 December 2009 at 4:14 am Permalink

    I think some locs are stigmatized. I personally like the smaller sized locs that people get done at the hairdresser or start on their own. If there are parts between each loc I think it looks good.
    On the other hand to me “freeform” locs is just another way to say letting your hair loc up because you didn’t comb it. Controversial to say maybe but I just don’t like it

    Reply
  2. Trecia 3 December 2009 at 9:22 am Permalink

    I’m not going to lie,I’m not crazy about free forming just because its not something I find attractive..Its not something I would be comfortable wearing either. Excuse me if thats ignorant, as its my own personal opinion. People are always going to have something negative to say about how we wear our hair its just how it is. I say she do whatever works for her bearing in mind that it will be extremely difficult and to have close supporters around…

    Reply
  3. Tonya 3 December 2009 at 9:23 am Permalink

    I applaud Nev! She is being her true authentic self — and you couldn’t ask for more. I will say however, that sometimes think of locs as “the easy way,” (of seeing results, length etc) but I acknowledge that’s crazy thinking. There is no “easy” or “hard” way of doing things, it’s what you feel comfortable with and what you want out of life. Kudos to you.

    Reply
  4. Monique 3 December 2009 at 9:47 am Permalink

    I think a lot of naturals feel the need to make sure certain styles are “work-appropriate” because our hair in it’s natural state is already so different. It can be big, wild and crazy, but that doesn’t mean our hair is not done. However others don’t always see things like that, especially if you work in a conservative environment.

    Although I support any style/form of locs, others in the mainstream definitely see it as an “unkept style.” Not saying it’s RIGHT, but it is what it is…

    Think about it, when have you ever seen a sista with free form locks or a 4b fro(in it’s natural state – no styling done) on TV???

    Reply
  5. Chidi 3 December 2009 at 10:11 am Permalink

    I’m rather apathetic when it comes to locks for the most part. Don’t get me wrong, some are very beautiful. I love Goapele’s locks, they’re gorgeous. But for the most part it’s neither here nor there with me.

    Now please try to understand, the natural hair community isn’t obligated to accept locks any more than they are obligated to accept a twist out as a go-to style. Please remember that it is a hairstyle. I know some natural girls who only do wash and gos, never do bantu knots and sometimes do twist outs.

    It’s a matter of taste. No one’s grows in lock form. It’s brought about intentionally and consciously so why not regard it as just a hairstyle? (Of course I’m aware that if hair was left alone for long enough it would start to lock on it’s own but these days ppl have a predetermined outcome for even deciding to free form)

    As far as “freeformed locks” I can understand why people don’t care too much about that and those reasons transcend ethnicity if you ask me. There was this white girl who left her hair uncombed and unmanipulated for 8 years or so that went to my HS (The story is that her dad died when she was young and he used to comb her hair), but honestly everyone thought her hair looked a hot mess. People even questioned if she washed it…ever.

    Not saying its inherently right or wrong to do, it’s just that the majority of ppl regardless of hair texture and race still manipulate their hair to achieved desired results everyday so I’d hate for anyone to assume that I’d have to accept a black woman’s free forming locks anymore than I would have accepted the white girl’s free forming knots.

    Reply
  6. Ashley 3 December 2009 at 10:35 am Permalink

    Hmm… I think they are stigmatized by most people has being dirty, gross and unprofessional on both blacks and whites. I think they are pretty cool has long as they have some upkeep.

    Reply
  7. MissyD 3 December 2009 at 11:19 am Permalink

    I would like to first say that I do have an appreciation for Natural Hair and Natural beauty. But free forming locs, I just can’t always get down with.

    I’ve seen people with all sorts of loc looks. Short, long, different lengths, different colors etc. Locs can be really diverse. But free forming locs do not always translate well into the mainstream world. Mainstream hair is something that neat, tidy, and clean. A lot of people see free forming locs are something that is unkempt and dirty.

    And sadly its because a majority of the people I’ve come across who had free forming locs did have big chunks of dandruff and whatever else in their hair. Besides that big hair seems to intimidate people. Whether its long locs or a big Dolly Parton wig, big hair draws attention.

    I say good luck to anyone who is trying to change societies views, but one group of people is all it takes to ruin it for everyone. And so far the group of people who have been reppin the free forming locs have not been doing it well.

    Reply
  8. Black Girl With Long Hair 3 December 2009 at 11:50 am Permalink

    Here are my two cents: We’ve had locked style icons on BGLH and we’ve had free strand style icons. To me, attractive natural hair is attractive natural hair, whatever the style or texture.

    Nia, our most recent locked icon, had gorgeous red (dyed) locks… and we actually have a couple more locked icons coming up.

    However, I think that developing locks is a process, just like developing a beautiful head of free-form hair is. Every style icon on BGLH has developed some measure of ‘completion’ and ‘resolve’ with her look, which can then be presented as a model to the BGLH community.

    I wouldn’t have someone with young, young locks (that haven’t even been fully locked yet) as a style icon. Just like I wouldn’t have someone who just did the big chop a month ago and hasn’t even figured out her style.

    Nev was a Now and Then icon because her transformation was beautiful, and the locks suit her far better than her relaxed hair did.

    But the standard for style icons — locked or not — is a level of style clarity and completion.

    Reply
  9. Black Girl With Long Hair 3 December 2009 at 11:51 am Permalink

    Woops… I actually forgot that Leah was our most recent locked style icon.

    Reply
  10. xay 3 December 2009 at 12:04 pm Permalink

    I think that there is a stigma against freeformed locs and young locs. There is a so called “ugly” phase with locs in the first year as the locing process starts whether your locs are free formed or cultivated that people are intolerant towards because they think your hair looks unkempt and messy. The budding process is not always pretty and depending on the texture of your hair and how you choose to maintain your locs can make your hair look pretty wild. I think that the appearance of freeformed locs triggers the assumptions that people with locs have neglected, unkempt dirty hair.

    Personally, I like the look of freeformed locs and cultivated locs.

    Reply
  11. luvmylocs 3 December 2009 at 12:22 pm Permalink

    i had locs for almost 6 years. they were neat and smaller (pencil sized or smaller). i retwisted about every 5 or so weeks. people loved my hair!! i wasnt much for doing a bunch of styles but i would wear them up, in a bun and also crinkly from time to time. i got a job at a top corporation with my locs. i’ve been promoted with my locs. i teach at the gym and got that job with locs. i think locs can be accepted by others as long as they are neat, clean and maintained. the freedom from locs is unparalled.

    i love the look of sisterlocks but i don’t like the cost or having to depend on someone to do my hair. now my hair is loose again and it’s still a challenge because with locs you just wake up and go for the most part. my hair was waist length in locs and it was a wonderful feeling. also, i didn’t feel like i needed nearly as many products and treatments with locs. it does require maintenance but it’s easier on the wallet i think.

    i never felt more or less accepted by other naturals when i had locs. more than likely i’ll loc again. it’s a great option when you want to stay natural but want a style that’s a bit easier on the day to day maintenance.

    Reply
  12. Nina 3 December 2009 at 12:23 pm Permalink

    Wow…good to see people being honest and sharing their opinions, but I have to admit that I’m a little stung. I hope we all see that some of our ideas about what is “unkempt” or “unclean” come from someone else’s standards. I can’t speak for anyone else, but my hair gets washed SO much more often than it did when it was relaxed or when it was loose and natural, and maybe that’s why I’m so troubled by the perception of locs as dirty. They’re really just matted hair, and yes, you can wash them thoroughly despite that. If you couldn’t people with lightened locs would be in trouble. But I digress.

    Does Bob Marley count as someone who represented well for the freeform movement? He didn’t have a loctician. He didn’t latch or palm roll. His hair wasn’t meant as a fashion statement, but he definitely did a lot to bring that style into the mainstream and for him it was purely about spiritual expression. What we did with locs once they became popular is a testament to our creativity and resourcefulness. But sometimes that goes incredibly wrong and I’ve seen women twist, latch and nearly snatch themselves bald for the sake of “neatness.”

    Reply
  13. Patty 3 December 2009 at 12:34 pm Permalink

    I know what you are going through and I’ve had my locs for going on 9 years now. People are always talking about my hair and saying that it needs to be retwisted or why it looking so untidy! At one point, I began to retwist my hair every 2 weeks, because I work at a law firm, but now, I don’t care do it. I realized that my hair is growing even thicker since I began to wait about 2 months to retouch my locs. I applaud you for this and ask that you continue to grow it naturally. Too many people have the habit of retwisting locs at an early stage, which thins out your locs and you never get to see the real beauty of it, when you let it grow. Good luck!

    Reply
  14. bnme 3 December 2009 at 1:04 pm Permalink

    i have read everyones comments, and i just don’t get it. are we not individuals. who says that locs are trying to be mainstream, freeformed or cultivated. that’s the whole point of locs. people loc, i loc, because i love the texture of natural hair. i like the feel of it in my hands. that is why some, including me, freeform. the hair is washed, conditioned and moisturized. everyone wants to know what their hair texture is, but when someone wants to showcase theirs, you are examined and evaluated on whether you have the right to. i combed out my three and a half yr old shoulder length traditional locs to start over and freeform. i think they are more expressive of who i am and just as beautiful. at work i get the looks and stares, but no one can say i blend in with the crowd. i wouldn’t be me if i did, hence the name. let us as sister from now on, even if you don’t like the style, look to encourage one another. we’re all trying to wear our crowns!

    Reply
  15. Amina 3 December 2009 at 1:06 pm Permalink

    I love freeform locs
    When I was freeforming, I had many compliments but also looks..lol
    supremedjan did a video on freeform hate and she’s soo right
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2X_kFe3-To

    Reply
  16. NappturallyHappy 3 December 2009 at 1:36 pm Permalink

    Are locs stigmatized in the natural hair community? I find that hard to believe, but maybe that’s because they’re extremely popular in the DC Metro area. I absolutely adore locs and am considering transitioning myself. I am West Indian and, having grown up around rastas, I differentiate between locs/locks and dreads. Free-form locs fall into the latter category and I would say I’m a big fan, but I say do you. It’s all about confidence. I saw an asian guy on the metro recently with the most beautiful dreads. He had a very artsy vibe and they fit him perfectly. Not everyone will like what you do. Keep on trekkin anyway.

    Reply
  17. Amma Mama 3 December 2009 at 2:10 pm Permalink

    I think locs are stigmatized. When I first cut my hair people and my friends were like “Whatever you do, just don’t loc it”. People giving me that warning me. I wouldn’t get locs but I think they are veRy beautiful :-) O and I agree with what you said Leila “clarity and completion”, so true!

    Reply
  18. ayanna 3 December 2009 at 3:56 pm Permalink

    i think when you have it in your life often, it affects your positionality. i have natural hair–always have. free form locks are not for me BUT i have had my own hair, unrefreshed and uncombed for a a while and had people assume it was some kind of locking going on. even though i don’t think it looked that way [always a black american. i am west indian] and they’d be like “i love your locks!” or “i looove women with locks” random dude trying to mack. i just smile, say thanks and keep it moving. kinda funny that uber-fluffy, big, messy-once-a-twist out replete with textures MUST be locks. could not be anything else.

    i’ve had close friends and family trod as orthodox rasta/bobo ashanti, nyabinghi–what have you and their hair was/is as free form as it gets. their kids too. waaaay waaaay free form. lol. nappy and growing as it may. i also had friends who LEFT the movement and STILL rocking a natty so i guess in that respect, it’s more or less a STYLE for them and even others still that never trod and i always think it’s beautiful. and works. even someone NOT on a trod and anyone with a free-form natty, i tend to think is on a trod of SOME sort, whether they see it that way or not–whether they identify as rasta or NOT. and that’s what i see, a resplendent tuffness [mental and otherwise] and strength and a kind of beauty, different from me who choose to style up and comb up but beauty nevertheless.

    i say if is your calling–do what works for you! from what i hear [not here necessarily, in general around the place], it seems that people have more issues with matting in unmanipulated afro-textured hair specifically and in free locks especially, than the non-existent parting and the smoothness of the roots. matting of afro hair especially throws people into a tizzy and is unacceptable to some but not everybody who free forms gets matting–it all depends. either way, like i said, if it calls to you and it’s good for you–answer. blessup all my natural heads!

    Reply
  19. Maria 3 December 2009 at 4:20 pm Permalink

    I didn’t think they were stigmatized, until I read the comments above and it seems that most who have commented agree that they are. I’m actually quite surprised.
    To me, locs are so beautiful, and the ultimate in natural hair. For those with 4a or 4b hair, I think it’s our default state (in my opinion).

    I wore cultured locs for 7 years before BCing about a year ago. Admittedly, the first 18 months were quite difficult, when my hair wouldn’t do what I wanted it to do, but by the third year they had settled in and I would often get complimented on them.

    I do wonder if our distaste for them stems from the past, when we viewed matted hair as being ‘poor, black, and the furthest away from the white ideal’. Rastafarians and Sadus, who loc their hair due to religious beliefs, have both been outcasts of mainstream society. We as a community seem to have an almost fervent dislike for what we believe to be ‘messy, unkempt hair’, and I wonder if it perhaps stems from a deeply hidden desire to ‘be accepted’ by the dominant culture. (controversial?!)

    To me, locs are beautiful, whether cultured or freeformed. It’s the ultimate in accepting who you are, without a long list of products and regimes.

    Reply
  20. tammyanka 3 December 2009 at 4:33 pm Permalink

    i was excited to see this question as a former lock star who recently chopped her locks off i have had lots of comments about how nice my hair was then and why would i “regress” to wear free forms, fros, twist and go’s etc.

    i am confused. when i started the locks, folks were concerned since i’d cut off my long healthy relaxed hair to do so. as the locks grew long and gorgeous i was more presentable. its a tier huh? i wanted to feel my texture and learn about my hair. the locks didn’t not allow that.

    Yes there is stigma. Locks are what is expected if you want to go natural in many circles – at least it is tamed!! and commonly seen..fros etc have way too many variations to be accepted just yet, the freeness for many suggests non conformity. maybe one day the world will be so evolved…..my kids will enjoy the ‘advocacy of bglh and others

    peace
    tammyanka

    Reply
  21. Blackbeauty123 3 December 2009 at 4:35 pm Permalink

    I do think locs especially free forming locs are not completely accepted in the natural hair community. It sad that we as a race feel the need to tone ourselves down (which we have been doin 4 centuries) so other races wont feel threaten by our strong & different appearances. This shows that even with natural sistahs slave mentality still lives on.

    Every ethnicity has beauty & is apart of God’s masterpieces. I just wish that instead of looking at our differences as curses & things that need to be fixed/shunned whether that be straighten,lightened or trying to force our natural hair to be more curly!! Instead of trying to cower from our differences we should view them as beautiful exotic, distinct features that set us apart from the rest of society in a wonderful way.

    We are one of the only cultures whose hair can lock naturally…its a beautiful thing people!! WAKE UP! Dont let other races stereotypes of us & our hair reflect how we view ourselves.

    Reply
  22. Anya 3 December 2009 at 4:49 pm Permalink

    In typical Nigerian mainstream culture; locs are considered a sign of dirtiness, waywardness, or even madness (also known as “dada”). A person with locs may be considered as someone who is morally depraved, like a drug addict, for instance. It is only nowadays, I would say since the millennium, that locs ‘coming out of the closet’ with major celebrities donning the controversial style (e.g, Dakore & another female singer in Lagbaja’s band).

    I think sister locs or more deliberately-constructed styles are more socially acceptable than free-form rasta-looking dreds. But confidence is everything. If she rocks her free-form dreds with self-confidence then she can knock off the haters. But there will still be awkward stares from some people.

    Reply
  23. Tha L 3 December 2009 at 4:59 pm Permalink

    Greetings Sis. Your question, “is there a stigma against locks, even in the natural hair community” honestly made me laugh a little. I say this because, as a woman who has been locked up for nearly 10 years, I can honestly say that I have seen more stigma against non-locked natural beauties than myself with my locks. Some of the most beautiful natural styles can be seen as unprofessional, unkempt, or dirty, but I can honestly say that (besides my own personal insecurity in the beginning about what my boss might think) I’ve never experienced anything besides admiration since I’ve joined the lock’dom. Another honest statement that I’ll make here, is that I have caught myself looking down upon women with non-locked natural hairstyles as noncommittal (as if every woman with natural hair should desire to have locks). I know it’s wrong, but if there are judgments made about people with locks, I’m here to expand and say that there are also judgments made about people without.

    Reply
  24. M.J. 3 December 2009 at 5:35 pm Permalink

    I also have mixed feelings about locs. I have seen BEAUTIFUL, small locs (on both men and women in all phases- from 1 inch long to mid back) and I have seen awful looking, makes-me-start-itching locs. I think it’s all about neatness. If the hair doesn’t look neat, I won’t like it and make no apologies for that. That’s not an ethnic thing. I’ve seen white and asian girls who had unkempt hair- they also made me itch. Locs don’t equal unkempt in my book, but in NYC I’ve certainly seen my fair share of raggedy locs.
    Here’s my thing, (and I’m prepared to get pelted with eggs for this) I think so many people (black, white and in between) mistakenly associate our natural hair with Buckwheat or “ewww”, or whatever. IMO, if that hair is a FAIR representation of Black hair, then the stringy, matted blonde hair of the homeless white guy is a fair representation of caucasian hair (nevermind the hair we see in hair commercials). Point is, our hair is beautiful, like anyone else’s, when maintained; but in celebrating our natural hair, I’m not sure we should begin saying “natural, Black hair is beautiful, therefore I don’t have to comb it”.
    But, let me reiterate: I have seen people with beautiful, neat, VERY professional locs in all phases and lengths. I think it’s just a matter of how you start and then maintain them.

    Reply
  25. Jhavia 3 December 2009 at 5:40 pm Permalink

    I think locs are stigmatized. People make assumptions about loc wearers. I have been offered marijuana on several occasions, and I do not smoke. I have been called Rastafarian. People stare at me…it’s ridiculous. People think I don’t wash my hair when in fact, I was my hair regularly. People with natural hair sometimes judge me. They ask me “How could you do that to your hair?” Or they think I am just locking my hair to have long hair…or they perceive me as being lazy. Whatever the case, it is sad that I face judgement all around…from those with natural hair as well as those with relaxed hair or weave.

    I think freeform locs can be just as beautiful as any other natural style. I chose to do traditional locs, but I love natural hair PERIOD.

    Reply
  26. Patricia Grannum 3 December 2009 at 6:03 pm Permalink

    I smell some hypocrisy here. As natural girls we blow the trumpet saying I can wear my hair how I want and still be beautiful yet we have a young lady here who is doing just that but it’s free form locs so there’s an issue. To be honest this conversation reminds me of the hooplah over whether Zahra Jolie Pitt should wear her hair loose or combed. Honestly who cares, just do what makes you happy

    Reply
  27. Amma Mama 3 December 2009 at 6:55 pm Permalink

    well said M.J.

    Reply
  28. Adlyn 3 December 2009 at 7:05 pm Permalink

    Frankly, when I first though about free form locks, I didn’t even know what it was (which was yesterday when I saw a video and the person said she was going to start free forming again.) Then I learned what it meant and I was like, ew! I then thought about it while reading the comments and now I’m like, I LOVE IT! But only after being informed. I Think the average person being drenched in euro-centric ideas on how hair is supposed to look is going to be disgusted. But not all.

    Thanks for talking about this topic!

    Reply
  29. The Notorious Z.A.G. 3 December 2009 at 9:29 pm Permalink

    Well, I had locks, and did not like them. I tried to feel good about them. I went through the “ugly phase” and I hated them. My hair grows fairly quickly, so they were shoulder length in under 2yrs. Length…was not the problem. I hated my hair. I tried curling them, twisting them, putting them in all kinds of intricate styles, but I still could not stand the look, or the feel of them. Meanwhile, a friend of mine has waist length locks and I adore her hair. The point is, to each his or her own. Freeform locks..are natural hair. She is rocking with them, I adore her hair. If you look clean and neat, why assume that your hair isn’t the same? Now if you look like a grunge bag and your hair is done, I have a problem, lol. Natural is natural, as long as you’re feeling it who cares what anyone else thinks?

    Reply
  30. Patricia Grannum 3 December 2009 at 9:54 pm Permalink

    Is there even such a thing as “the natural hair community”

    Reply
  31. Grace 3 December 2009 at 11:31 pm Permalink

    what hypocrisy going on here…wow iam amazed by what so called “i am proud of natural hair” people are saying….really what is wrong with freeform locs? i do not have locs or plan on having them however, i am proud of every black or any other race of women for that matter, who has come to a point where they want to be true to themselves regardless of what people think or mainstream society wants us to thinks…what is the point of natural hair? isn’t it to be free of societies trap of beauty? isn’t coming to a point of enlightenment about the subtle self hate relationship we have had with our hair for so long due to the presentation of another standard of beauty by mainstream society? If it is then why is freeform locs supposed to be a “stigma”? it is interesting to note that natural hair that is not locked is considered a stigma by others and now within natural heads free form locs are considered a stigma? what a shame that is all i have to say…thanks for this topic because it has exposed the heart of many within the so called natural hair community…..no wonder the craze over curl pattern….Naturals ask yourself this question…why did you go natural? maybe in that you may understand this beautiful young ladies reason of free forming…except for those who went natural “just because”

    Reply
  32. NappturallyHappy 3 December 2009 at 11:38 pm Permalink

    @Patricia Grannum, that question really has me thinking. Is there a natural hair “community?” We toss the term around a lot, but does this community really exist. I personally find some naturals to be some of the most judgemental people, supportive only of what fits into their idea of natural beauty. Look at the comments about Halle when she wore her natural or Solange when the pics first came out or about Venus on the forum. Instead of being applauded for being brave enough to be natural in an industry where weaves are king, the “natural community” bombarded the net with negative comments. The styles weren’t cute enough. They didn’t put in enough effort. There was nothing special about them…….. How can we call ourselves a community if we continue with the same judgemental habits. If we want to call ourselves a natural community, we have to be open to appreciating a wide spectrum of natural styles.

    Reply
  33. Black Girl With Long Hair 3 December 2009 at 11:49 pm Permalink

    Just want to throw a thought out here:
    Does being a community mean that we like whatever style any natural decides to do?
    Do we lose our right to be critical because we are a community?

    Reply
  34. MSJAIM 4 December 2009 at 1:44 am Permalink

    ugh.. if i see one more person associate an ugly phase with locks im going to f’n scream- no such phase exists…all that aside its ur natural hair. I say ppl should feel free to do what ever the hell they are ever so inclined to do with it W/ out worrying about the backlash from other ppl’s ignorance or non- appreciation of the PERSONAL aesthetic that u decide is a right fit for YOURSELF and YOUR LIFESTYLE. as long as ur hair is clean, whats the prob? yes people are entitled to their personal opinions & we are not all cogs W/ in the “machine”, but the true rationale behind the personal opinions is whats sad. Do locs have a stigma, sure-seems like most ppl are less intimidated and feel less threatened & visually assaulted by smaller sized locs. Some ppl have an unfavorable opinion towards locs as a whole. I had locs ( about the size of a pencil)for a total of 8 yrs & encountered comments & opinions that ran the gamut from super freshness, I love ur hair, to do u have some weed? to why u put them things in ur hair to why r they so small- do u wash ur hair?-locs r dirty.. um no dirty ppl r dirty… cant please every one & I damn sure wasnt trying to & neither should anyone else. Ive always had an appreciation for both organic/ free form locs & medium size , semi manicured, smaller sized- however u want to describe it.. its all about the individual

    I also agree with the poster grace above. There def is some hypocrisy W/in naturals & the hair typing obsession, please dont even get me started on that…Sorry for the rambling, it almost 1 in the morning

    Reply
  35. Amma Mama 4 December 2009 at 2:41 am Permalink

    No we don’t lose our right. If someone has a hairstyle that isn’t cute, one doesn’t HAVE to like it just because it’s “natural”. My friend is natural but she doesn’t like wearing her hair in an afro,she likes its for others but not for herself. Some people like locs and others don’t. Some like it others but would never get it (that’s me) It’s that individual’s opinion and they’re free to have one. Locs don’t make a person more “true to themselves” versus a person who doesn’t have locs.

    Reply
  36. Jade 4 December 2009 at 8:19 am Permalink

    The thing is, not everyone is going to like each and every single style out there. That is fact and has nothing to do with having euro-centric mindset either. Seeing the beauty in an individual regardless of what style they wear on their head is all that matters. Also, wear your hair they way YOU want it. It’s bad to constantly seek some type of validation from others, even people in the “natural community” themselves.

    Reply
  37. Bri 4 December 2009 at 10:32 am Permalink

    I actually don’t like “freeform” locs either (we call them janks or hands here) as they tend to look (at least the ones I’ve seen) messy and unflattering. That’s just a personal thing. I just like locs with a little more method.

    Reply
  38. NappurallyHappy 4 December 2009 at 11:32 am Permalink

    It’s one thing to not like/appreciate a certain style. It’s another to make comments, thus making the person who chose that style feel uncomfortable. We’re all entitle to our opinions. We’re not necessarily entitled to share them without being asked.

    Reply
  39. mochacurl 4 December 2009 at 2:37 pm Permalink

    I think a mess is a mess. Not appreciating natural hair should not stem from texture…that’s been my platform. I like locs, but anything just thrown together – that’s how it looks – can be off-putting.

    Reply
  40. The Notorious Z.A.G. 4 December 2009 at 4:42 pm Permalink

    @MSJAIM – As far as I’m concerned, my whole phase of locks was ugly. You making a statement like that is being just as “judgemental” as those “naturals” who only like a certain kind of hair.

    The whole term natural really gets my goose, if you ask me. What is “natural?” Is dyed hair still natural? Pressed? Weaved? Wigged?

    As humans, we are judgemental creatures. Its just the way of the world. So let’s just stop pointing fingers and calling names and being negative. As long as you are pleased with what you’re doing to your hair, at the end of the day, that is all that matters. That’s when things will be as they should. We want to label EVERYTHING, and its just silly. Adult women, by doing this we are not setting a good example for the teenage and young girls and boy who want to let their unaltered hair blossom and who want to embrace it. Love your hair no matter what anyone else has to say about it. Live your life for you, because in the end, no one else is gonna die for you.

    Keep moving forward ladies!!

    Reply
  41. MSJAIM 4 December 2009 at 7:08 pm Permalink

    @ The Notorious Z.A.G.,I stand by my statement & Its def your perogative to refer to your hair being loc’ed or your begining stages of loc’n as ugly if u please, but I dont advocate negative self perceptions- thats the rationale behind my statement. Im sure there was nothing ugly about ur hair. Ive been on several hair boards/ blogs & that term & negative way of thinking just perpetuates the whole topic were discussing now. what Ive noticed with some ppl who start locs is they see the end result that they want to acheive, not realizing that like everything else, its a process. Those fuzzies with locs are not ugly but a part of what natural hair (read: refers to hair TEXTURE that has not been chemically altered) does to actually loc up. I also see no correlation with my abhorrence for the usage of the term ugly stage in reference to locs to being judgemental with hair types is like comparing apples to bananas…but ppls perception is their reality.

    Reply
  42. Sheer Almshouse 5 December 2009 at 6:14 am Permalink

    I have quietly followed this blog for a very long time. I’ve never even been interested in posting before now. As a woman who has worn her hair natural for most of her adult life (except for a short 2 month stint) I am just amazed by the comments here. But am I surprised? I can’t say that I am.

    I have noticed here that there have been many occasions in which lines seem to be drawn and demarkations made about what is natural and what is more authentic natural, etc. This is a huge surprise to me because as far as I am concerned, natural hair denotes unprocessed hair and the natural style is a personal choice, that may change as desired.

    Many African women do not have issues with wearing an Afro and in fact, many schoolgirls wear it as their style. A low Afro is for many, a style, not a means to an end. I have worn one on three separate occasions since I was 17 because my hair philosophy is simply: it is expendable; it grows back.

    Who are we? We are all progressive, conscious, confident women of African heritage from all over the world who have realised that the notions of straight and long need not apply to our definition of our own beauty. The hair in its natural state is a symbol of the taking back of a power that was stripped from us with all the creamy crack aspirations and the socialization that “anything black no good.” So why are we even judging our sisters? Our hair is a representation of our enlightenment. Let us not trivialize just how much of a big deal it is for women of African heritage to be comfortable in their own skin and hair!

    Let’s not add lines of demarkation where there is no need. Certainly, we have had too much of that.

    Love and blessings from a Jamaican sister to rest of the massive :)

    Reply
  43. Efuru 5 December 2009 at 7:07 am Permalink

    I think there is a stigma, one blog that champions natural hair was like I don’t ‘support relaxers and locs on children because they are permanent’ (What? They aren’t even in the same category!)Locs are gorgeous! Especially the big and beautiful ones (like on the musician Valerie June). As a kid in Lagos(Nigeria), one of my childhood friends had the most gorgeous freeform locs (dada we used to call them) I have ever seen (even to this day), but they were for religion reasons and I was gutted when he chopped them off and then I moved to the UK and would see so many people with one HUGE ‘lock’ of hair that seems to be dragging the whole world around in it (loose or locced, lint in hair is horrible). Ever since I went natural I have more appreciation of ALL natural styles.

    Reply
  44. Sarah 5 December 2009 at 9:18 am Permalink

    Anyone regardless of hairstyle can be professional or unprofessional. People are just judging those with freeform locks before knowing them. Yes, Bob Marley had freeform locks and he smoked ganja a lot, but most ppl w/ freeforming locks are just average ppl like everyone else. I currently do a wash n’ go and just wear my afro out, but i’m considering getting locks in may. I’d get regular locks and not freeform ones though. Just my preference. People can prefer any hairstyle they want but why call those with freeformed locks or even regular dreadlocks lazy or dirty. Its not a matter of preference w/ ppl its a matter of negative stereotypes.

    Reply
  45. Nakias 5 December 2009 at 1:55 pm Permalink

    In my opinion, locs cannot truly be considered ‘natural’ unless they are free-form locs. There is nothing natural about the locking process. Manicured locs are twisted into submission to create a neat, easily-digestable style for the masses to accept. I am a natural woman of two years, and I absolutely love free-form locs. Nev, keep doing your thing.

    Reply
  46. luvmylocs 5 December 2009 at 5:49 pm Permalink

    nakias that’s interesing…locs not ‘natural’. do you feel that when someone’s hair is in a two strand twist or cornrowed it’s not natural either? not trying to be confrontational just curious about your logic on manicured locs not being considered natural.

    Reply
  47. emma 5 December 2009 at 8:12 pm Permalink

    I just don’t like free form locks. I’m sorry. I think it’s because it’s too limiting in style. with more uniform locks you can do more things, IN MY OPINION. Have I seen beautiful free formers? YES. Do I look down on free formers? NO. It’s just me. Sometimes I don’t like high ponytails on certain people with straight hair. Sometimes I don’t like locs on certain men. Sometimes I don’t like afros on certain women. Are they still wonderful people? YES This is just a question of aesthetics for me. I don’t think they are dirty or weird or outlandish. Just not my preference. As long as they are happy, I’m happy. Who cares what I think? I don’t pay their bills. :-D

    Reply
  48. Amma Mama 6 December 2009 at 12:09 am Permalink

    If you don’t have chemicals in your hair, that’s natural! When did manicured locs become NOT natural?

    Reply
  49. Amma Mama 6 December 2009 at 12:12 am Permalink

    Sometimes I think blk people find anything to divide us.”If you don’t loc your hair then your NOT TRULY natural.” “If you have manicured locs, then you’re NOT TRULY natural.” Since when did all of this become true?? Even if it is true, why does it matter? Sometimes there are more important things in life than whats on top of someone’s head.

    Reply
  50. Gen 6 December 2009 at 5:05 pm Permalink

    I’ve been natural for 5 years and have come to admire the different hair textures, “types” (i know the term is loaded) and styles that we can achieve. I admire manicured locs modeled by Goapele and Lauryn Hill, as well as sister locks. For me, my preferences are really based on versatility. With loose hair I feel like I have can anything and more that I could do with my relaxed hair (minus the chemical damage) and I feel that those with manicured, somewhat small locs, can accomplish just about all the styles one does with loose natural hair (save for straight). I would like to know if the styling options for those with free forms are limited? Can one rock twist outs, bantu knots, buns, formal updos, etc. with free form locks? I assume that there are more limitations but as I was ignorant about my own hair before going natural I may very well be ignorant about this as well. As for the bias against locs: Most folks I know admire or at least feel neutral about manicured locs. I think free form locs, when short may look like uncombed hair. B/c many, including myself, value grooming, if hair looks uncombed then there will be a stigma attached. I hope to now look at those who may be doing free form locs w/ new eyes, realizing that they are locking and don’t just feel like no longer combing their hair.

    Reply
Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply

Upload Files

You can include images or files in your comment by selecting them below. Once you select a file, it will be uploaded and a link to it added to your comment. You can upload as many images or files as you like and they will all be added to your comment.